Conclusion 

Null results are common in scientific research, as not every experiment or study will confirm the initial hypothesis. Recognising null results as a natural and valuable part of the research process, rather than a failure, is key to advancing scientific knowledge. 

The benefits of publishing null results in a journal are clear: they contribute to the overall understanding of a topic; promote transparency and rigour; and help prevent unnecessary duplication of research efforts thereby reducing the waste of funding. Moreover, publishing these findings enables them to reach a global audience rather than remaining limited to a researcher’s immediate network or conference attendees, leading to greater equity. Yet there is a notable disparity between how researchers value null results and how they believe their peers perceive null results. 

Whilst personal attitudes towards null results are largely positive or neutral, perceived attitudes held by peers are less constructive. Concerns about negative bias, co-author reluctance to share null results widely, and negative reception from peers, institutions, and research funders contribute to an attitude-behaviour gap. 

This issue largely stems from the lack of recognition given to researchers who publish null results because of the limitations of current research assessment practices. Without fair and inclusive metrics, there is little incentive for researchers to invest time and effort into publishing these valuable results. 

Supporting and encouraging researchers that it is important to share null results and addressing their publishing-related concerns is crucial to encouraging submissions based on null results. These concerns include a lack of understanding of where and how to submit null results, and doubts about whether submissions will be accepted for publication. 

To bridge this gap, following recommendations for each stakeholder group in the academic community is essential. These can be summarised as below:  

• Educational and awareness campaigns to improve perceptions of null results 
• Funding and institutional support to help researchers share null results openly 
• Clearer journal policies with guidance for editors and peer reviewers 
• Stakeholder collaboration to advance research assessment reform

By collectively addressing researchers’ concerns and challenges, we can foster an environment where null results are valued and published, ultimately benefiting the entire academic community.